EggXpert

The official Newegg tech support community and Newegg tech support forums. Learn about PC building, case mods, computer repairs, and computer troubleshooting. Get help from knowledgable community members about computer hardware and computer software, laptops, notebooks, netbooks, consumer electronics & mp3 players, home networking, lcd TVs, home audio and more.
Welcome to eggXpert.com. Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Advanced Search

Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

Last post 10-09-2012, 8:05 by products. 33 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (34 items)   1 2 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  01-25-2011, 7:04 680286

    Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    [Best viewed with Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, or Microsoft Internet Explorer Browser]

     

    Well, I've been seeing quite a few posts here and there that asks the same question, should I upgrade my videocard? and if so, how much of an upgrade would I receive or if I would even gain any performance boost at all. i admit, the model naming/branding scheme is a tad bit confusing, especially with the new AMD cards that dropped the ATI tag. So I decided to develop a chart on excel and paste it here that consists of modern day videocards of both nvidia and amd/ati from generally the most powerful in terms of raw gaming performance, to the very least. I've broken it down to by tier and then again by generation. I really hope this will help people think and choose before upgrading/side-grading and understand just a bit where you stand and how much you're expecting to upgrade to.

     

    Tier <1> - The highest performance gaming video cards on the planet - Without a doubt the best for hardcore gaming and high resolutions, may hurt wallet and electric bill.

    Tier <2> - The enthusiast gamers performance card - Breath taking performance for modern gaming with out "overkilling" the majority of games on the market today like "Tier 1" and "Tier 0" cards would.

    Tier <3> - The casual / all-around gamers performance card - Perfect for entry level gaming. For gaming on resolutions 1920x1080 or greater, Tier 2 or greater may be more suitable. Solid cards none the less.

    Tier <4> - The light gamers performance card - Excellent for light gaming and casual work, however not recommended for modern graphic intense games. Great for home theater computer systems.

    Tier <5> - Not recommended for modern gaming - Great for casual work, if planning for modern gaming it would be best to upgrade to a higher tier. Can be used for low budget home theater computer systems.

    Tier <6> - Terribly outdated - Typically used for simple applications, comparable to integrated / on-board graphics.

    Tier <7> - Obsolete technology - Will not even start up modern games, due to not meeting bare minimum requirements. If your graphics card is not on the list, it is most likely far too outdated and below Tier 7 quality.

    Tier <0> - The luxury gaming graphics card - Utterly dwarfs all other graphics cards / tiers performance in comparison. The absolute finest technology created to bring you to the zenith of what performance really is, to a point where it would possibly be considered unnecessary.



    ATI - AMD


    NVIDIA

    Radeon


    GeForce

    [Tier 0]======================

    [Tier 0]======================

    HD7970X2[Ares II]*


    n/a




    HD7990*


    GTX690*




    n/a


    GTXTitan, GTX580X2[Mars II]*




    HD6990*


    GTX780, GTX590*

    [Tier 1]======================
    [Tier 1]======================

    HD5870X2[Ares]*


    GTX560Ti[2-Win]*




    HD7970, HD6870X2*, HD5970*


    GTX680




    HD7950


    GTX670




    HD7870XT


    GTX660Ti

    [Tier 2]======================
    [Tier 2]======================

    HD7870


    GTX660, GTX580, GTX460[2-Win]*, GTX285X2[Mars]*




    HD6970, HD7850, HD4870X2*


    GTX570, GTX480, GTX295*




    HD6950, HD5870


    GTX560Ti




    HD6930, HD4850X2*


    GTX470

    [Tier 3]======================
    [Tier 3]======================

    HD7790, HD6870, HD5850


    GTX560




    HD6850


    GTX650Ti, GTX465, GTX460, GTX285, 9800GX2*




    HD7770, HD5830, HD4890


     GTX280, GTX275




    HD7750, HD6790, HD4870


    GTX550Ti, GTX260

    [Tier 4]======================
    [Tier 4]======================

    HD6770, HD5770, HD4860,  HD3870X2*


    GTX650, 8800[Ultra]




    HD6750, HD5750, HD4850, HD4790, HD3850X2


    GTS450, GTS250, 9800GTX+




    HD4770, HD4830


    9800GTX, 8800GTX, 8800GTS




    HD7670, HD6670, HD5670, HD4670X2*


    GT640, GT545, 9800GT, 8800GT

    [Tier 5]======================
    [Tier 5]======================

    HD7570, HD6570, HD5570, HD4750, HD3870, HD2900XT


    GT630, GT440, GT340, GT240, 9600GT, 7950GX2*




    HD7470, HD5550,HD4730, HD3850, HD2900GT, HD2900PRO, X1950XT


    GT620, GT530, GT430, GT330, GT230, 8800GS, 7900GX2*




    HD7450, HD6450, HD5450, HD4670, HD2600XT, X1950GT, X1950PRO


    GT610, GT520, GT420, GT320, GT220, 9600GSO, 9500GT, 8600GTS

    [Tier 6]======================
    [Tier 6]======================

    HD7350, HD6350, HD4650, HD2600PRO, X1900XT


    GF605, GF510, 9400GT, 8600GT, 8600GS, 7950GT, 7900GTX, 7900GTO




    HD4550, HD3690, HD2400XT, HD2400PRO, X1900GT


    GF405, GF315, 8500GT, 7900GT, 7800GTX




    HD3650, X1800GTO, X1800XT


    GF310, GF210, 8400GS, 7900GS

    [Tier 7]======================
    [Tier 7]======================

    HD4350, HD3470, X1650PRO, X1650XT


    7800GT, 7800GS, 6800[Ultra]




    X1600XT


    7600GT, 7600GS, 6800XT, 5950[Ultra]




    X1300XT, X1300GE


    7300GT, 6800GS, 6800GT, 5900[Ultra]




    X1550


    6600GT, 5900XT



    Note: Video card models with an asterisk (example: 9800GX2*) are dual GPU's cards. For information about power requirements please view here.

     

    Note: Video cards with bold names indicates support for Directx11

     

    Note: Chart and rankings are based on mostly non-physx modified game / benchmarks

     

    Disclaimer: This chart is in no way an official grading system for the video cards, as they all perform differently for different games/benchmarks. This is just a general layout, or more of a "measuring unit" to place where the products stand, and who the competitors are, from older/newer generation cards to rival companies.


    If I am missing anything or anyone feels something is out of place, please do not hesitate to correct/update me.

     

    Hope you all find this chart useful.

     

    Interesting Trivia :

    - The GeForce 9800 series cards are remakes of the GeForce 8800 series (example: 9800GT = 8800GT)

    - The GTS250 is the 9800GTX+ with a re-branded badge name

    - The GTX460[2win] is a dual GPU card, however it cannot be combined with another GTX460[2win] or any other card for Quad-SLI due to the limitations of the GF104 design. There is a SLI bridge connector however it will not work. This applies to the GTX560Ti[2win] as well

    - The GTX465 is said to be a crippled GTX470 that couldn't meet certain conditions. This led to the making of a GTX465, which pales in comparison to even a GTX460 in some cases.

    - The HD6770 & HD6750 are the HD5770 & HD5750 with re-branded badge names

    - The HD6950 is found to be one of the most popular cards due to its ability to tweak the bios to run at full HD6970 speed/settings.

    - The HD7970 of AMD is the worlds first discrete GPU that used a 28nm GCN architecture, The GTX680 is the first for Nvidia.

    - The GTX680 has been such an outstanding single GPU, that it has been sold out for month(s) after release due to much popular demand.

     

     

    Removed S3 Chrome from list, focused only on AMD/ATI and NVIDIA ~ (4/5/12)


     

    [last updated: 5/24/2013]

     


    Antec 902 V3 | MSI Z68A-GD65 | Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz | EVGA GTX680 | G.Skill Sniper 16GB (4x4GB) 1600 | Corsair TX650W | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Western Digital 500GB Caviar Blue | Corsair H60 | G.Skill FTB3500C5 | Asus CD/DVD Burner | Yamakasi Catleap Q270 LCD (2560x1440) | Logitech G110 | Logitech G500 | Windows 7
  •  01-26-2011, 6:40 680471 in reply to 680286

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Nice effort bro, and I would surmise there may be a few out there that would pitch in and try to maintain an ongoing list, much like the PSU list. Some of us though do generally use Tom's, at the end of their monthly best value article series, see: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-graphics-card-radeon-hd-6870-geforce-gtx-570,2834-7.html

    Again though, nice addition, don't want to discourage input, as I am sure it would make a nice little discussion thread.

    Penewah! 


    Box 1 (Mountain Mod Acension Duality : 2500K/HeatKiller LT, Feser 360w3xGTyphoons 1850s /ASrock Extrm4 Z68/90GB CrucialSSD/2X2 Reapers DDr3 2000/ GTX 480 SC w/ Koolance/CORSAIR 850HX:, 2nd system: i7-3930K Heatkiller 3.0 2011/ASRock Extre9 X79/EVGA 680GTX /850W-XFX/Mushie redline 2133 8GB / Build #2: LianLi/HTOmega Striker/128GB Samsung 470 SSD/ #3: Giga Z77 w/ 3570 Ivy/CrucBallies/3.75Tbs of Spinpts, 64GB Crucial SSD/
  •  01-26-2011, 8:08 680495 in reply to 680471

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Thanks

     

    Ah yeah, I knew of that list but the second I saw they put a 8800GT on top of a 8800GTS, and a 9800GX2 two levels off the 4850X2, and 8800GT 2 levels below the 3870, I immediately saw it was pretty inaccurate :x

    So I looked at as many benchmarks as I could to get a closer comparison on each of the cards for a more detailed comparison power vs power, as the list on toms i think is more for price vs performance ;p


    Antec 902 V3 | MSI Z68A-GD65 | Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz | EVGA GTX680 | G.Skill Sniper 16GB (4x4GB) 1600 | Corsair TX650W | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Western Digital 500GB Caviar Blue | Corsair H60 | G.Skill FTB3500C5 | Asus CD/DVD Burner | Yamakasi Catleap Q270 LCD (2560x1440) | Logitech G110 | Logitech G500 | Windows 7
  •  02-28-2011, 10:43 AM 690384 in reply to 680495

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Nice. Added this to my favorites. Cool I'd be willing to come back and contribute to it if need be.
  •  02-28-2011, 12:15 690494 in reply to 690384

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    With the newer drivers, the GTX 470 is on par with the 5870..

     http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-570-gf110-performance,2806-8.html

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-570-gf110-performance,2806-9.html

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-570-gf110-performance,2806-12.html

    So I think either bump the 470 into Tier 1 or move the 5870 down to tier 2? It doesn't make sense to me to have the 570 and 470 in two different tiers..

     

     Also, I'd put the 295 and 4870x2 down a tier for it's lack of support for Tessellation and DX11.. Further, these two cards are using last generation's fab tech which means they bring less performance per watt / less performance for the amount of heat generated than the newer cards..

     


  •  03-01-2011, 6:48 691178 in reply to 690494

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    thanks for the update guys, I'll look into it later this week, been busy studying for exams >.<


    Antec 902 V3 | MSI Z68A-GD65 | Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz | EVGA GTX680 | G.Skill Sniper 16GB (4x4GB) 1600 | Corsair TX650W | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Western Digital 500GB Caviar Blue | Corsair H60 | G.Skill FTB3500C5 | Asus CD/DVD Burner | Yamakasi Catleap Q270 LCD (2560x1440) | Logitech G110 | Logitech G500 | Windows 7
  •  03-01-2011, 7:08 691188 in reply to 691178

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Good luck on your exams! I kind of lucked out and most of my classes aren't doing mid terms.
  •  03-01-2011, 7:14 691192 in reply to 691188

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Studying!?!?! Blasphemy. Show up drunk and drooling and wearing nothing but someone else's dirty clothes. (They have to be at least four sizes bigger than you.) Flirt with the other students loudly and ace the test like a crazy person!

    Studying... Pffft. That is what you *Should* do. Do something crazy enough and they may just pass you through to get rid of you. Confused


    I quit. I am not coming back.
  •  03-01-2011, 7:15 691194 in reply to 691192

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    OmniNegro:

    Studying!?!?! Blasphemy. Show up drunk and drooling and wearing nothing but someone else's dirty clothes. (They have to be at least four sizes bigger than you.) Flirt with the other students loudly and ace the test like a crazy person!

    Studying... Pffft. That is what you *Should* do. Do something crazy enough and they may just pass you through to get rid of you. Confused

    What highschool did you go to again? ROFL

  •  03-01-2011, 7:21 691199 in reply to 691194

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    None. I never once set foot in any highschool. And I am old as dirt too. I made up a high school every last time I had to declare it on a job application. They never once checked. I am pretty certain the names I made up never existed before that. And certainly not in that town.

    If I was applying to a retailer, I would commonly list my high school as something to the effect of "Retailers Suck High School".

    I was always amazed when I was hired.

    *Edit* Please delete this post. Gandalf reminded me that we are spamming a useful post. Sorry everyone. And a half dozen more of mine here should go too. Wow. I really should just sleep a bit.


    I quit. I am not coming back.
  •  03-01-2011, 7:23 691205 in reply to 691199

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Lol. I know you didn't that's why I made the wise crack. Anyway, that's pretty ironic.

    We're also OffTopic though, we're not in the general discussion section, so let's get back on topic.

  •  03-01-2011, 7:28 691212 in reply to 691188

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    hehe, thanks gandolf im going to need it, but too bad for me all my exams are impossible to luck out on simply because they're all math related... >.<


    Antec 902 V3 | MSI Z68A-GD65 | Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz | EVGA GTX680 | G.Skill Sniper 16GB (4x4GB) 1600 | Corsair TX650W | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Western Digital 500GB Caviar Blue | Corsair H60 | G.Skill FTB3500C5 | Asus CD/DVD Burner | Yamakasi Catleap Q270 LCD (2560x1440) | Logitech G110 | Logitech G500 | Windows 7
  •  03-01-2011, 11:21 691282 in reply to 691212

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Cool chart, breaks it down nicely. One thing that might be worth noting is it is not always a good idea to just buy a card based onwhat you see in a chart, while it give a general idea does not show which game prefer which video cards driver sets.  Like for mei, I play alot of City of Heroes an older game that still pshs card pretty hard.  ATI/AMD has been trying to years to make drivers that work with this gae and have failed.  (they even sponsored the game for a few years)  

    *These driver issues can go both ways depending on the game so please do not feel I am calling out one company over the other, I have cards from both companies in mei house to use depending on the game or software I am using.

    So if you are a big time player of one game check reviews at many site till one covers your fav game and see which card plays your game the bestest.  Yes


  •  07-11-2011, 4:07 733189 in reply to 680286

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Update: For people disputing about the higher end GPU's especially consisting of the HD6970, HD6950, HD5870, GTX580, GTX570, GTX480.


     For resolutions that actually put the GPU's to the test:




     

    Source: Techpowerup.com


    Antec 902 V3 | MSI Z68A-GD65 | Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz | EVGA GTX680 | G.Skill Sniper 16GB (4x4GB) 1600 | Corsair TX650W | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Western Digital 500GB Caviar Blue | Corsair H60 | G.Skill FTB3500C5 | Asus CD/DVD Burner | Yamakasi Catleap Q270 LCD (2560x1440) | Logitech G110 | Logitech G500 | Windows 7
  •  07-19-2011, 3:21 736672 in reply to 680286

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Update: For mid tier

     

    source: techpowerup


    Antec 902 V3 | MSI Z68A-GD65 | Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz | EVGA GTX680 | G.Skill Sniper 16GB (4x4GB) 1600 | Corsair TX650W | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Western Digital 500GB Caviar Blue | Corsair H60 | G.Skill FTB3500C5 | Asus CD/DVD Burner | Yamakasi Catleap Q270 LCD (2560x1440) | Logitech G110 | Logitech G500 | Windows 7
  •  09-25-2011, 2:48 757623 in reply to 680286

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Suggestion:

    Put the Memory of each video card into your chart. I love the chart as is, but I can't tell which type of lets say 6950 you're referring to. 

  •  09-25-2011, 3:40 757636 in reply to 757623

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Depending on the game and resolution, there often will be no significant performance difference between a 1GB and 2GB model. I agree, the distinction would improve the chart a bit, but it would be a very subjective comparison.
  •  09-26-2011, 6:39 AM 757789 in reply to 757636

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Yea, Video memory only helps prevent a loss in performance at very high resolutions and texture quality settings...If the game doesn't use it all, then it doesn't do jack for your performance to have more of it.

     

     


  •  10-18-2011, 3:52 763846 in reply to 757789

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Ok I probably already know the answer to this question, but I am going to ask it anyways. Are these tests that are done, done in single player? I assume they are.

    System Specs
    VGA:MSI N660Ti PE 2GD5/OC
    MB- Gigabyte z77x-d3h OS:WINDOW 7 HOME 64 bit
    CPU:Intel i5-3570
    Memory:vengance ddr3 16 gb
    HD: 500 gb western digial
    SSD: crucila m4 128 gb
    PW: Corsair AX 850
  •  04-07-2012, 5:32 811692 in reply to 680286

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    High end tier (4/17/12)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Source: Techpowerup


    Antec 902 V3 | MSI Z68A-GD65 | Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz | EVGA GTX680 | G.Skill Sniper 16GB (4x4GB) 1600 | Corsair TX650W | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Western Digital 500GB Caviar Blue | Corsair H60 | G.Skill FTB3500C5 | Asus CD/DVD Burner | Yamakasi Catleap Q270 LCD (2560x1440) | Logitech G110 | Logitech G500 | Windows 7
  •  08-15-2012, 12:40 AM 843209 in reply to 811692

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    GTX 660 Ti Review by Tweaktown.

    http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/4869/nvidia_geforce_gtx_660_ti_2gb_reference_video_card_review/index.html 

    Equivalent to the Radeon 7950 and above the GTX 580.

    However AMD is releasing a BIOS update for the 7950 to increase the clock speed. So, I guess this is gonna fall between the 7950 and 7870.

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7950_Boost_BIOS_Upgrade/


    i7-2600k @4.5GHz, Scythe Mugen 2 Rev. B, 8GB DDR3 1600, GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD3P, GeForce 9500GT, PC P&C 610W, Plextor M3 128GB, Hitachi GST 7K3000 x2 & WD Black, ASUS DVD & LG Blu-ray Burners, Win7 Pro x64, CM 932 Case.
    HTPC + Media Server: http://www.eggxpert.com/forums/permalink/5855/836221/ShowThread.aspx#836221
  •  08-16-2012, 10:14 AM 843641 in reply to 843209

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Thanks Products YesCool

    Antec 902 V3 | MSI Z68A-GD65 | Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz | EVGA GTX680 | G.Skill Sniper 16GB (4x4GB) 1600 | Corsair TX650W | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Western Digital 500GB Caviar Blue | Corsair H60 | G.Skill FTB3500C5 | Asus CD/DVD Burner | Yamakasi Catleap Q270 LCD (2560x1440) | Logitech G110 | Logitech G500 | Windows 7
  •  08-16-2012, 7:53 843802 in reply to 843641

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    Sure, thanks for managing the list, NTChicken. Big Smile

    According to this, the 660 Ti is similar to the 7870.  Which is better seems to depend on the game....

    The 7950 in this already has the new BIOS.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-660-ti-benchmark-review,3279-2.html


    i7-2600k @4.5GHz, Scythe Mugen 2 Rev. B, 8GB DDR3 1600, GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD3P, GeForce 9500GT, PC P&C 610W, Plextor M3 128GB, Hitachi GST 7K3000 x2 & WD Black, ASUS DVD & LG Blu-ray Burners, Win7 Pro x64, CM 932 Case.
    HTPC + Media Server: http://www.eggxpert.com/forums/permalink/5855/836221/ShowThread.aspx#836221
  •  09-12-2012, 6:49 AM 849074 in reply to 843209

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    GTX 660, equivalent to the Radeon 7870 in most cases

    http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/4922/nvidia_geforce_gtx_660_2gb_reference_video_card_review/index9.html

    It's such a tight race. 

    7870 = GTX 660 < GTX 660 Ti < Radeon 7950 (after the BIOS update)  Maybe the GTX 580 and GTX 660 Ti have to be in their own category above the 7870 and GTX 660? Lol!


    i7-2600k @4.5GHz, Scythe Mugen 2 Rev. B, 8GB DDR3 1600, GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD3P, GeForce 9500GT, PC P&C 610W, Plextor M3 128GB, Hitachi GST 7K3000 x2 & WD Black, ASUS DVD & LG Blu-ray Burners, Win7 Pro x64, CM 932 Case.
    HTPC + Media Server: http://www.eggxpert.com/forums/permalink/5855/836221/ShowThread.aspx#836221
  •  09-12-2012, 4:24 849147 in reply to 849074

    Re: Video Card Gaming Performance Hierarchy Chart

    thanks products, will update tonight. been meaning to fix some things, and removing beta cards that never officially released (yet) like hd6970x2 / hd7970x2

    Antec 902 V3 | MSI Z68A-GD65 | Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz | EVGA GTX680 | G.Skill Sniper 16GB (4x4GB) 1600 | Corsair TX650W | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Western Digital 500GB Caviar Blue | Corsair H60 | G.Skill FTB3500C5 | Asus CD/DVD Burner | Yamakasi Catleap Q270 LCD (2560x1440) | Logitech G110 | Logitech G500 | Windows 7
Page 1 of 2 (34 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML

 Home   Forums   Chat   Blogs   About 

 FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us 

©2013 Newegg, Inc. All rights reserved.