Wouldn't hurt. I'm getting pretty good performance out of a 6000+, and I've playe dit on 4000+/4200+ and its wasnt as good by far. I can still get some lag every so often now with the 6000+ (w/ 8800GT SSC , 59FPS solid.) The Minimum is 2.8 GHz or faster (XP) or 3.2 GHz or faster (Vista), so a better CPU, again, probably wouldn help.
9600GTs SLI'd should be doing much better, so somethings up. Darn game is so resource intensive, I don't even think the minimums are close to being enough.
Peace, Penewah!
#1:MSI K9A2 790FX/AMD Phenom 9950BE125w OC 3.12/Xiggie120/Antec1200/HD4870 1GB ASUS/mushkinBlack 4GBDDR2800 /Sammy Spinpoint 640GB&320GB-SATA/PCPC 750W CF Silencer/ LITE-ON & ASUS DVD±R/Vista 64-bit/Dual 22" HannaG Mons/ WD My Book 500GB/Logitech X-530 70 watts RMS 5.1 Black Speaker System /#2:Biostar 780G/AMD 6000+x2/OCZ PlatRev2 2x1GB DDR2800 /Logysis-Acrylic/Vista/Ubuntu 8.1 / Corsair 550W PSU/#3:E8500/Gigabyte P45/HD4850/Xiggie 120/OCZ StlhStrm 700W, CM HAF case/OCZ Plat 2x! 1066