Sniper I think you and products are looking at this in the wrong way! It is not quad core Intel vs i7 because i7 is quad core as well and is built by Intel, the problem lays with the chipset and what the mobo will allow in CPUs. Just so this will make better sense for you let us step back 10 years when the 478/P4 came out these were single cores but each mobo type 845, 850, 865 and 875 used these at various speeds from 1.2 Celeron to 3.6 Preston. Then they came out with the LGA775 chipset starting with the 915 thru the 975 again it started with a different P4 CPU until the dual core Pentium D's came out then the dual cores and the quad cores came out then the mobos changed to G & P 31, 35, 43, 45 and then the X38 and X48 along with the extreme dual core and the Quad cores then they jumped from 65nm to 45nm which caused the P43, P45 and the X48 mobos to hit the streets. Then out came the highend X58 mobo with the 1366 chipset better known as the i7 and a few months later out came the 1156 chipset with the P55 mobo known as the i5/i7 now the 1156 chipset will not get more cores but might get changed to the 32nm to sell more CPUs but if not it too will be a deadend build cause Intel has already stated that the 1366 will get the 6 cores CPUs and may get the 32nm too since it is their main stream chipset for the next 2-3 years. Now this is way over simplified because you could right a book on the whys and where fores of Intel and what they have done and are planning on doing. So in the end it all depends on how current you wish to stay with technology versus how much cash you have to layout for this technology.
what goes around comes around
(RIG)GA-EP45-UD3P, Q9550 @ 3.5 ghz, CM's V8, HD2600XT512mb 128bit, 4gigs OCZ 1066 ddr2, Seagate sata 120 gig & a 320 gig, 2 Liteon sata DVD Burner, My DIY Case, Corsair 550watt PSU, 2ea 19" LCD monitors.