EggXpert.com
18 November 2007

Beowulf in IMAX 3D

It was kind of a haphazard plan, but my cousin and I decided that it would be a good idea to see the recent Beowulf rendition by Zemeckis in IMAX and in 3D.  We saw it today (Saturday) and the experience was well worth the 10.25 I paid for it, I would have been willing to pay 20.50 for it!

Firstly, I have to say that despite the criticism this film received prior to its debut about the CGI overlay style, I think it worked extremely well.  The CGI overlay opened up options in terms of cinematography, allowing the fantasy-esque appeal of the story to be fleshed out via stylistic lighting, and more creative camera work.  The 3D goggles I was wearing certainly helped to immerse me into the films settings and plot, although the 3D was a bit overwhelming at first.  Visually, Beowulf was excellent, but the real question is whether or not the story-arc of the movie was handled well.

If you've read the text of Beowulf, then you know that it is a very generic (by today's standards) story with subtle undertones of love, grief, and the imperfect nature of man.  The text focuses on heroism, defining the archetypal hero with attributes such as courage, physical strength, perseverance and what not.  Well, I can tell you the movie pulls these things off very accurately, and of course that's not necessarily a good thing.  Yes the fact that the movie followed the story arch of the text for the most part is respectable, but its also predictable.  The movie suffers only because the reference material is so generic and lacking of depth.  It's an action movie, nothing more really; that said, it is a good movie, one worth paying a steep price to see and you'll like it if your not expecting too much from it.

I sit down in the IMAX theater, and one of the first things I wondered was how Grendel would be portrayed.  I've seen 3 different personalities of this being (Beowulf the original text, Beowulf and Grendel, with Gerard Butler, and the novel simply titled Grendel).  Both the movie with Gerard Butler as Beowulf and the novel (more of a long short story) Grendel portray the being as a victim rather than a criminal and the same goes for the Zemeckis version.  Giving Grendel a backstory adds just a little more depth to the story so I'm glad they went that route.


Overall it was a good movie (especially in IMAX 3D), but keeping in mind the not-so-deep reference material, I guess there was no reasonable way to make it anything more than an action fest.  The visuals were nice, the casting was good (although I think they could have found a better actress to play the role of Grendel's mother, Jolie just wasn't strange enough), and the plot was executed finely.

I'm giving Beowulf a 7/10
 

Comments

# Blog Picks said:

Beowulf in IMAX 3D This is an objective comment of Beowulf…. Created by ac3raven , 11-17-2007

20 November 07 at 1:53 AM
# Capt. Insane said:

I thought it was c**p. I saw it in a "standard" 3d theater, not IMAX: the glasses they gave out squeezed my head painfully and the 3d gave me a headache because it wasn't focused right. And I didn't even feel the 3D added much to the movie. Secondly, the plot was horrible at best. I've read the book (it's actually an epic poem), and it was much better. **SPOILER**I don't recall there being any part of the book where Beowulf sleeps with Grendel's mom.

The CG, however, was freaking amazing. That, and seeing Angelina Jolie naked, was the only thing that made the movie worth seeing. Though, the scene where Beowulf was naked made me want to gouge my eyes out.

20 November 07 at 9:05 AM
# tekla75 said:

I read the epic poem in High school and thought it was okay,the wording was too fancy for my taste. And then when I found out it was going to be made into a movie I was like "oh gee its gonna get worse." Movies almost always ruins literature.

I haven't seen it. Nor will I ever watch it..well maybe for free on cable. I'm not big on the whole CG thing either it takes away from the acting. But I do understand how others think its really cool. I hated it on 300 and it's one of the main reasons why I refuse to watch Beowolf. I just like real people in movies. And watching it in 3D would be murder on my eyes.

Its good to hear both sides of it though. I guess if I do decide to go check it out. I should go in expecting the worse and maybe I'll be suprised.

**A CG nudy scene..crazy..the things technology can do.

20 November 07 at 2:16 PM
# AlBob said:

yah they almost always ruin literature

they just can't put the words to tape

Ben Hur for example that movie was nothing compared to the book...left out tons of scenes.

Al-Bob

20 November 07 at 2:57 PM
# tekla75 said:

I should just stop reading books and wait for the movies. That way I wont be dissapointed.

thinking is for suckers anyways..jk..

20 November 07 at 3:42 PM
# nickthetech said:

i think it was good but i would say the book had more feeling to it

21 November 07 at 4:21 PM
# defiledfrog said:

The Poem was awesome it depicted a HERO, the movie depicted a CHUMP who was only interested in personal gain, CG was pretty good but there where a couple of characters that looked like A$$ (Queen Wealthow).

True there is a nude scene but you dont see anything.  

There are actually two nude scenes and I speak for all the dudes here you dont wanna see the anything in the first one, thank god they hid everything.

All in all Stupid Hollywood spew trying to remove the thought that people actually believed there was un-selfish people in the world willing to help others without an agenda to really only help oneself, and to ruin a perfectly good piece of literature.

READ THE POEM

27 November 07 at 11:05 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled